Skip to main content

The determination of the radiochemical purity of Actinium-225 radiopharmaceuticals: a conundrum

To the editor

Main text

The recent emphasis on actinium-225 radiopharmaceuticals has led to underestimate a serious problem related to the measurement of their radiochemical purity (RCP). The rules of Good Radiopharmacy Practice (GRP) dictate that RCP of an injectable radiopharmaceutical must be determined by a suitable analytical method prior to patient administration. RCP is defined as the ’ratio of the activity of a radionuclide in a stated chemical species in a material over the total activity of all species containing that radionuclide in this material’ (Gillings et al. 2021). A logical implication of this definition is that RCP for a radiopharmaceutical can be rigorously determined only after establishing its true molecular identity. Since this fundamental characterization cannot be performed routinely in a radiopharmacy with conventional quality control methods, a widely accepted approach is to first isolate and structurally characterize an authentic sample of the chemical species supposed to possess the same composition and molecular architecture of the radiopharmaceutical. This fundamental characterization is usually accomplished by applying techniques for structure determination to macroscopic amounts of the authentic sample synthesized using a stable isotope of the radionuclide incorporated into the radiopharmaceutical. Then, the chromatographic profile of the authentic sample can be compared with the profile of the corresponding radiopharmaceutical both collected using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and/or Instant Thin-layer Chromatography (ITLC) under the same experimental conditions for cross validation (Thakral et al. 2021; Hooijman et al. 2021). When there exists a close matching between these two chromatographic profiles, it is reasonable to assume that the radiopharmaceutical has the same chemical identity of the authentic sample. After this preliminary characterization, to assess RCP of a radiopharmaceutical prepared routinely in a hospital setting in compliance with GRP rules, it is sufficient to check whether its HPLC or TLC chromatogram always includes the peak corresponding to the authentic sample.

The paucity of purified actinium materials combined with the lack of stable isotopes and measurable spectroscopic properties for this element has prevented the isolation and structural investigation of authentic samples of its coordination compounds and made it arduous to determine their chromatographic properties (Deblonde et al. 2021; Kovács 2021). Without the support of these data, it appears difficult to strictly adhere to the rigorous definition of RCP. The issue of RCP becomes more dramatic considering that the chromatographic profiles of actinium-225 complexes can be measured only after decay of the pure α-emitting radionuclide to its γ emitting daughters. Exemplary are the conventional methods to detect the γ emission of francium-221 after reaching the secular equilibrium with the precursor actinium-225 (Hooijman et al. 2021). Although models (Kelly et al. 2021) have been developed to calculate RCP of actinium-225 radiopharmaceuticals from γ decay of francium-221, this approach raises serious questions about the interpretation of chromatographic results since the integrity of actinium-225 radiopharmaceuticals is always challenged by the so-called alpha recoil effect caused by the emission of the α particle (Kozempel et al. 2018). This process can irreversibly disrupt the molecular scaffolding of the coordination complex, thus making the attribution of chromatographic data to a specific radiolabeled species uncertain. Ultimately, the simple ITLC cannot be considered on its own a suitable method for routinely assessing the RCP of actinium-225 compounds since radiolysis with alpha emitters very efficiently produces impurities that are not identified. These uncertainties demonstrate that accurate measurement of RCP for actinium-225 radiopharmaceuticals still constitutes an unsolved problem in radiopharmacy.

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

RCP:

Radiochemical purity.

ITLC:

Instant Thin-layer chromatography.

HPLC:

High Performance Liquid Chromatography.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AD and JK were responsible for writing and editing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriano Duatti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kleynhans, J., Duatti, A. The determination of the radiochemical purity of Actinium-225 radiopharmaceuticals: a conundrum. EJNMMI radiopharm. chem. 7, 23 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41181-022-00175-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41181-022-00175-y