Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry
EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry Cover Image

Otto: a 4.04 GBq (109 mCi) 68Ge/68Ga generator, first of its kind - extended quality control and performance evaluation in the clinical production of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11

EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry volume 5, Article number: 5 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Here we report on the comprehensive quality control of a 4.04 GBq (109 mCi) generator supplied by itG (Munich, Germany), and used for routine production of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 for clinical imaging. The performance of the 4.04 GBq itG 68Ge/68Ga generator was studied for a year and parameters including elution yield, elution profile, radioactive and stable contaminants were collected. The production yields of a series of 175 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 clinical batches are also reported herein.

Results

This first-of-its-kind GMP grade 68Ge/68Ga generator from itG with a nominal activity of 4.04 GBq (109 mCi) showed a stable 68Ga elution profile with elution efficiency averaging 58.3 ± 3.7%. 68Ge contaminant in the eluent slightly increased over time but remained 100x lower than those reported for comparable 1.85 GBq (50 mCi) itG generators. Metal impurities were found in concentrations lower than 100 ng/ml (ppb) throughout the study. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 was obtained in 89 ± 4% radiochemical yields and > 99% radiochemical and chemical purities.

Conclusion

4.04 GBq (109 mCi) itG 68Ge/68Ga generator is suitable for routinely produced 68Ga tracers used in the clinic. Up to 30% higher amount of final drug product was obtained as compared to the 1.85 GBq (50 mCi) itG generator, and as a result larger number of studies could be performed, while reducing the synthetic burden.

Key points

QUESTION: Is it possible to scale existing 68Ge/68Ga generator technology to 3.7 GBq (100 mCi) without affecting performance for clinical use?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: A GMP grade itG 68Ge/68Ga Generator with a nominal activity of 4.04 GBq (109 mCi) at calibration was studied over a year resulting in unparallel elution reproducibility and affording 68Ga activity at an almost stable 58.3 ± 3.7% elution efficiency. A total of 175 clinical productions of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 were performed with an 89 ± 4% average radiochemical yield and > 99% radiochemical and chemical purity, producing up to 30% more drug product activity when compared to a typical 1.85 GBq (50 mCi) generator.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: This 68Ge/68Ga generator doubles the initial activity of existing generators accommodating higher patient volumes and resulting a longer shelf life while still performing according to specifications.

Introduction

The value of PSMA-targeted diagnosis and therapy monitoring of prostate cancer by means of PET/CT imaging is undeniable (Hana et al. 2018). While several groups are working on an 18F-labeled substitute for PSMA imaging (Kelly et al. 2017; Giesel et al. 2017; Szabo et al. 2015), [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (a.k.a. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC or [68Ga]Ga-DKFZ-PSMA-11) is the current gold standard (Hana et al. 2018). However, PET/CT imaging with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 is becoming a victim of its own success, and the increasing patient volume is calling for either the increase in generator production or the availability of generators containing higher initial activity, or both (Smith et al. 2013). Despite efforts to directly produce Gallium-68 (68Ga) in cyclotrons and because of many technical and financial complications (Pandey et al. 2014), currently 68Ga can only be reliably produced using a 68Ge/68Ga generator (Amor-Coarasa et al. 2016, 2017; McElvany et al. 1984; Amor-Coarasa et al. 2018). To date, the commercially available 68Ge/68Ga generators do not exceed the capacity of 1.85 GBq (50 mCi) (Amor-Coarasa et al. 2016, 2017, 2018; McElvany et al. 1984; Roesch 2013; Greene and Tucker 1961). Here we report a comprehensive quality control of a 4.04 GBq (109 mCi) 68Ge/68Ga generator produced by Isotopen Technologies Garching GmbH (itG GmbH, Munich, Germany); herein lovingly and appropriately referred to as “Otto” (Fig. 1). We also evaluate its use in the routine clinical production of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in combination with an iQS Fluidic Labeling Module.

Fig. 1
figure1

Otto: itG GMP 4.04 Gbq (109 mCi at calibration on 04/19/2018) 68Ge/68Ga Generator

Full size image

Materials and methods

Otto was received 40 days post calibration from Isotopen Technologies Garching GmbH (itG GmbH, Munich, Germany), containing 4.04 GBq (109.2 mCi on April 19, 2018) of Germanium-68 (68Ge). Otto is a metal free, GMP 68Ge/68Ga generator, based on an Dodecyl-3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoate hydrophobically bounded to an Octadecyl modified silica resin (C-18 resin). All elutions were performed with a syringe pump at a flowrate of 2 ml/min to assure consistency (KD Scientific 100 Legacy pump, USA). Hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%, 99.999% trace metal grade) used for elution was acquired from Sigma-Aldrich, diluted in 18.2 MΩ MilliQ water (Millipore) to obtain a 0.05 M solution for elution. DKFZ-PSMA-11 (GMP) was acquired from Advanced Biochemical Compounds (ABX, Radeberg, Germany). Sterile GMP labeling kits and fluidic cassettes were acquired from itG.

For labeling, Otto was eluted with 4 ml 0.05 M HCl, making sure an elution had been performed at least 24 h in advance. Generator elutions for quality control purposes were performed on a weekly basis - preferably on Mondays after weekend inactivity - using 6 ml 0.05 M HCl and collecting 6 × 1 ml fractions. Collected fractions were assayed for 68Ga activity content in a CRC-15 PET Capintec dose calibrator and left to decay for at least 24 h. All decayed fractions were counted to determine 68Ge breakthrough (reported as nominal activity, activity concentration, or as % of the total 68Ge activity in the generator at the time of elution) using a Wallace Wizard 3″ 1480 well-counter, and a 4.118 kBq (111.3 nCi; calibrated on 8/7/2017) 68Ge NIST traceable source was used for quantification. Fractions from elutions performed on days 41, 77, 111, 200 and 322 post-calibration were randomly selected (a representative sample spread over the year of study) and their 68Ga and 68Ge elution profiles are presented in the Results section. The same decayed fractions were analyzed by ICP-MS to determine the amounts of stable Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, and Al contaminants per elution and per fraction.

As stated before, the generator was eluted at least 24 h in advance of any patient study to eliminate excess 68Zn from 68Ga decay and radiolysis products. To further test generator’s performance, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 was labelled using the itG’s iQS 68Ga Fluidic Labeling Module and itG’s 68Ga Peptide Radiolabeling kit at 95 °C for 5 min as described previously (Amor-Coarasa et al. 2016). Briefly, 5μg of PSMA-11 were added to 1 ml NaOAc buffer solution included in the kit package. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 was purified using a reverse phase C18 Sep-Pak Light (Waters, USA) and filtered for sterilization through a Millipore Cathivex-GV 0.22 μm membrane before undergoing quality control testing. All QC testing was also performed as previously described (Amor-Coarasa et al. 2016), and included bubble point test, pH, sterility, decay, MCA, HPLC and pyrogen testing (Additional file 1: Table S4).

Results

The 68Ge/68Ga generator studied herein contained 4040 MBq (109.2 mCi) of 68Ge at calibration. This generator was used extensively in our department for almost a year, having undergone 230 elutions for clinical [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 production and generator quality control as well as > 100 additional elutions for preclinical research (the latter data not included in this study). The average 68Ga elution efficiency for this generator was 58.3 ± 3.7% (all reported values are decay corrected). Over the studied period, the elution efficiency remained remarkably consistent, as shown in Fig. 2 (slope ≈0). The maximum elution yield was 65.2% registered at day 103 post-calibration, while the minimum 43.0% was obtained at day 274 (Fig. 2). In contrast to the stable and reproducible 68Ga elution yield shown by Otto, the amount of 68Ge in the eluting solution increased over time, ranging from 4.8 × 10− 6% on day 82 to 7.9 × 10− 5% on day 350 post-calibration (and average of 6× increase within the studied period, expressed as % of 68Ge present in the generator at the time of elution) (Fig. 2). Despite this increase of 68Ge content with time, the amounts always remained under 0.001%, with an average value of (3.4 ± 1.8)·10− 5% (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Long term study of Otto. a. 68Ga elution yield (%) and b. 68Ge contaminant as % of 68Ge activity present in the generator at the time of elution

Full size image

During the first 100 days of use, 69.5±5.6% of the eluted 68Ga activity was found in fractions 3 and 4. The elution profile started changing gradually after day 100 with the bulk of the 68Ga activity eluted moving towards the elution front; 83.4±3.7% of the activity was found in fractions 2 and 3 (with a reduction to 34.4±13.6% in fractions 3 and 4) (Fig. 3a). The 68Ge elution profile also changed in a similar manner, accompanied by an overall increase in the eluted activity (Fig. 3b). Raw data collected is shown in tables in the Additional file 1: Table S1.

Fig. 3
figure3

Elution profiles on days 41, 77, 111, 200 and 322 post calibration for a: 68Ga as percent of total eluted 68Ga activity, and b: 68Ge as percent of the initial 68Ge activity present in the generator at the time of elution.

Full size image

The concentrations of metal impurities, such as Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, and Al, present in elutions 41, 77, 111, 200, and 322 were extremely low, always under 100 ng/ml (ppb) as shown in Fig. 4. The main impurity present was Zinc, mainly due to 68Ga decay. A comprehensive table containing the raw values presented in Fig. 4 is included in the Additional file 1: Table S2.

Fig. 4
figure4

Metal contaminant concentrations (ng/ml, ppb) determined by ICP-MS a: concentrations vs the elution number, and b: concentration vs elution fraction

Full size image

The average radiochemical yield for 175 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 clinical preparations using this generator was 89 ± 4%. The individual radiochemical yields over time (vs. generator age in days post calibration) are presented in Fig. 5. During clinical preparations, the radioactivity found in the waste vial accounted for only 3.4 ± 1.2% of total eluted activity - presumed to be free ionic 68Ga – and was not further tested. The C-18 sep-pak lite (used for final drug purification and reformulation) contained 5.5 ± 3.2% of the eluted activity while less than 2% of the activity (presumed [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, but not extracted for testing) was retained in the 0.22 μm Cathivex filter. The 68Ge radionuclidic impurity was not detected in the final drug product (< 50 Bq/ml or 1.5 nCi/ml: detection limit for 68Ge in our well-counter) and was found to be at similar levels in the waste vial during synthesis than that in the quality control elutions (Figs. 2 and 3). The radiochemical and chemical purity of the drug product was > 99% for all preparations of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, as determined by radio-HPLC.

Fig. 5
figure5

Syntheses of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 over the studied period a: Radiochemical yields (%) and b: Final product activity (MBq)

Full size image

A table containing the list with the Batch Release Acceptance Criteria for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 along with the average results obtained in 175 production syntheses is included in the Additional file 1: Table S4. A table containing the values plotted in Fig. 5 is also included in the Additional file 1: Table S3.

Discussion

Otto is yet another example of the outstanding performance achieved by modern 68Ge/68Ga generators. The 100% increase in 68Ge activity at calibration when compared to any other reported 68Ge/68Ga generator, did not led to any measurable increase of 68Ge content, radiolysis products or other metal contaminants in the elution. In fact, the purity of the elution of this particular 68Ge/68Ga generator outperformed any other reported generator in the literature (Amor-Coarasa et al. 2016, 2017, 2018; McElvany et al. 1984; Roesch 2013; Greene and Tucker 1961). The 100% increase in 68Ge activity at calibration, resulted in only a 20–30% increase in eluted 68Ga activity, due to a decreased elution yield when compared to previously published reports of similar generators from the same manufacturer (Amor-Coarasa et al. 2016, 2017). These elution yields did not appear to change significantly over time, eluting more than 1 TBq (≈27 mCi) of 68Ga a year after calibration (Fig. 2). In our clinical setting, this increase in overall eluted activity allowed us to prepare multiple doses of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 out of a single clinical production run, thus reducing the overall cost of drug production as well as the labor involved.

The decrease observed in both the 68Ge content and the elution yield cannot be explained since we had no part in the production of this generator, but we could speculate that it maybe is the result of incorporating an enlarged column to accommodate the higher initial activity. Interestingly, and contrary to previous reports, the amount of 68Ge breakthrough increased along with the generator age, as shown in Fig. 2. Nevertheless, the maximum 68Ge breakthrough observed (1.32 kBq or 0.036 μCi), accounts for only 8 × 10− 5% of the total 68Ge activity present in the generator at the time of elution, which is almost 100-fold lower than the one observed with previous generators at their purest 68Ge elution levels.

The elution profiles for both 68Ga and the 68Ge impurity changed over time. The highest activity concentration was initially found in fraction 3, and later moved to fraction 2. This change is again contrary to what was reported before for smaller generators from the same manufacturer, for which the elution profile was extended with time. While the elution profiles were determined in the 6 ml quality control elution, the elution yields were determined with all elutions (performed with both 6 and 4 ml). Hence, this initially extended profile could have reduced the overall yield measured when eluting with 4 ml 0.05 M HCl for labeling (Fig. 3a). This change in profile can also be partially responsible for the “stable” elution yield observed over time, as well as the minor elution yield variabilities here reported (Fig. 2).

The extended ICP-MS metal contamination study performed here revealed: i) the amounts of Iron contaminant found (main interference in the labeling of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11) were 10 times lower than the ones reported for previous 68Ge/68Ga generators from this manufacturer (Amor-Coarasa et al. 2016), ii) the Zinc contaminant was found in similar quantities to previously reported data for previous 68Ge/68Ga generators - most likely the direct result of accumulation due to 68Ga decay and iii) Of all other metals studied, Aluminum concentrations were always found to be the most prominent, however never exceeding 30 ng/ml (ppb). The amounts of metal contaminants did not change significantly during the studied period (p > 0.05) and did not showed a marked elution profile (p > 0.5, between fractions for all metals), which indicates that fractioning should perhaps be avoided as a purification method for this generator, given that there will not be a reduction in 68Ge amounts either (Fig. 3), and valuable 68Ga activity will be lost. Another important consideration is that the determination of metal contaminants presented in this report was based exclusively to quality control elution samples collected without the 24 h pre-elution that routinely precedes the clinical production runs of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. Therefore, the concentrations reported herein for metal contaminants represent the “worst case scenario” and are estimated to be significantly lower in production elutions.

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 syntheses were reproducibly performed with activity eluted from the 4.04 GBq (109 mCi) 68Ge/68Ga Generator and with an average radiochemical yield of 89 ± 4%. A few lower yield outliers could most likely be linked to operator manipulation errors. As stated before, the 68Ge breakthrough in the final drug product was found < 50 Bq/ml (< 5·10− 6% of 68Ge activity in the generator) at all instances, which is > 200 times below the acceptance criteria of 0.001% for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. The waste vial from [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 production was found to contain the bulk of the 68Ge breakthrough from the elution. No radio or UV impurities were noticed in any of the 68GaPSMA chromatograms, and all batches showed > 99% radiochemical and chemical purity. The pure and reliable 68Ga produced by Otto resulted in a year of reproducible drug production for clinical use. Although typically the manufacturer specified shelf life of 68Ge/68Ga generators is set to 1 year due to the decrease of 68Ga elution yield and the parallel increase in 68Ge breakthrough (Amor-Coarasa et al. 2017), this type of 68Ge/68Ga Generators (Containing approximately 3.7 GBq or 100 mCi, Otto-like) could easily surpass it while still performing according to specifications.

Conclusion

Otto, the first-of-its-kind GMP grade itG 68Ge/68Ga Generator with a nominal activity of 4.04 GBq (109 mCi) at calibration, was studied over a year. Otto’s performance showed unparallel reproducibility over the studied period and afforded 68Ga activity at an almost stable 58.3 ± 3.7% elution efficiency. Although amounts of 68Ge in the elution slightly increased over time, they always remained approximately 100-fold lower than previously reported for generators with lower 68Ge load (Amor-Coarasa et al. 2016, 2017, 2018; McElvany et al. 1984; Roesch 2013; Greene and Tucker 1961). Also, the amounts of other metal impurities were lower than the ones measured in previous reports (Amor-Coarasa et al. 2016, 2017, 2018; McElvany et al. 1984; Roesch 2013; Greene and Tucker 1961). A total of 175 clinical productions of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 were performed with an 89 ± 4% average radiochemical yield and > 99% radiochemical and chemical purity. Up to 30% more drug product activity was obtained when compared to a typical 1.85 GBq (50 mCi) generator, accommodating higher patient volumes.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional file.

References

  1. Amor-Coarasa A, Gruca M, Hurez S, et al. Impact of elution impurities on DOTA and NOTA labeling with two commercial 68Ge/68Ga generators. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2018;317(3):1485–90.

  2. Amor-Coarasa A, Kelly JM, Gruca M, Nikolopoulou A, Vallabhajosula S, Babich JW. Continuation of comprehensive quality control of the itG 68Ge/68Ga generator and production of 68Ga-DOTATOC and 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for clinical research studies. Nuc Med Bio. 2017;53:37–9.

  3. Amor-Coarasa A, Schoendorf M, Meckel M, Vallabhajosula S, Babich JW. Comprehensive quality control of the itG Ge-68/Ga-68 generator and synthesis of Ga-68 DOTATOC and Ga-68 PSMA-HBED-CC for clinical imaging. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(9):1402–5.

  4. Giesel FL, Hadaschik B, Cardinale J, et al. F-18 labelled PSMA-1007: biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and histopathological validation of tumor lesions in prostate cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(4):678–88.

  5. Greene MW, Tucker WD. An improved gallium-68 cow. Int J App Rad Isot. 1961;12:62–3.

  6. Hana S, Woob S, Kim JY, Suh CH. Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET on the Management of Patients with prostate Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2018;74(2):179–90.

  7. Kelly J, Amor-Coarasa A, Nikolopoulou A, et al. Synthesis and pre-clinical evaluation of a new class of high-affinity 18F-labeled PSMA ligands for detection of prostate cancer by PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(4):647–61.

  8. McElvany KD, Hopkins KT, Welch MJ. Comparison of 68Ge/68Ga generator systems for radiopharmaceutical production. Int J Appl Radiat Isot. 1984;35(6):521–4.

  9. Pandey MK, Byrne JF, Jiang H, Packard AB, DeGrado TR. Cyclotron production of 68Ga via the 68Zn(p,n)68Ga reaction in aqueous solution. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;4(4):303–10.

  10. Roesch F. Past, present and future of 68Ge/68Ga generators. Appl Rad Isot. 2013;76:24–3.

  11. Smith DL, Breeman WAP, Sims-Mourtada J. The untapped potential of gallium 68-PET: the next wave of 68Ga-agents. Appl Radiat Isot. 2013;76:14–23.

  12. Szabo Z, Mena E, Rowe SP, et al. Initial evaluation of [18F] DCFPyL for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging of prostate Cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17(4):565–74.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Citigroup Biomedical Imaging Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, 516 E 72nd St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
    • Nicole N. Waterhouse
    • , Anastasia Nikolopoulou
    •  & John W. Babich
  2. Radiochemistry Laboratory, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
    • Alejandro Amor-Coarasa
  3. Division of Radiopharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Belfer Research Building, Room 1600, 413 E 69th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
    • Anastasia Nikolopoulou
    •  & John W. Babich
  4. Molecular Imaging Innovations Institute (MI3), Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
    • John W. Babich
  5. Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
    • John W. Babich
Authors
  1. Search for Nicole N. Waterhouse in:
  2. Search for Alejandro Amor-Coarasa in:
  3. Search for Anastasia Nikolopoulou in:
  4. Search for John W. Babich in:

Contributions

AA and JB conceived and planned the experiments. NW acquired and analyzed the data. NW and AA wrote the manuscript in consultation with JB. AN acquired data and revised the work. JB supervised the project and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John W. Babich.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Waterhouse, N.N., Amor-Coarasa, A., Nikolopoulou, A. et al. Otto: a 4.04 GBq (109 mCi) 68Ge/68Ga generator, first of its kind - extended quality control and performance evaluation in the clinical production of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. EJNMMI radiopharm. chem. 5, 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41181-019-0087-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • 68Ga/68Ga generator
  • 68Ga
  • Gallium-68
  • [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11