Skip to main content

Table 1 Accuracy of the proposed method for the 3 compounds

From: Validation of a cost-effective alternative for a radiochromatography method to be used in a developing country

DMSA %RCP

Mean ± CV

MIBI %RCP

Mean ± CV

HMDP %RCP

Mean ± CV

Scanner

Counter

Diff

Scanner

Counter

Diff

Scanner

Counter

Diff

99.7 ± 0.1

99.5 ± 0.1

0.2

99.3 ± 0.4

99.2 ± 0.1

0.1

99.9 ± 0.0

99.4 ± 0.2

0.5

99.2 ± 1.1

99.2 ± 0.1

0.0

98.5 ± 0.4

98.8 ± 0.7

0.3

97.8 ± 1.0

98.0 ± 1.0

0.2

92.0 ± 1.7

91.8 ± 1.1

0.2

91.3 ± 3.7

90.6 ± 3.0

0.7

96.6 ± 1.0

95.2 ± 0.9

1.4

87.9 ± 1.6

88.1 ± 1.3

0.2

84.7 ± 0.6

86.0 ± 2.0

1.3

87.1 ± 1.2

86.3 ± 1.1

0.8

82.9 ± 0.8

81.9 ± 1.5

1.0

78.9 ± 5.0

78.4 ± 7.0

0.5

82.0 ± 0.6

82.1 ± 0.8

0.1

  1. N = 3; Diff: difference between RCP from scanner and counter for each product; CV coefficient of variation.