Skip to main content

Table 4 Newcastle–Ottawa Scale assessment for case–control studies (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute 2019; Singh et al. 2015)

From: Safe use of radiopharmaceuticals in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review

Study

Selection

Comparability

Exposure

Total score

Adequate definition of case

Representativeness of cases

Selection of controls

Definition of controls

Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis

Study controls for any additional factor

Ascertainment of exposure

Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls

Non-response rate

AktaÅŸ et al. (2008)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

*

0

1

El-Zeftawy et al. (2017)

0

*

0

0

*

*

0

*

0

4

Kode et al. (2017)

0

*

0

0

*

*

0

*

0

4

Tobes et al. (1989)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

*

0

1

Toriihara et al. (2015)

0

*

0

*

*

*

0

*

0

5

  1. '*' means one awarded point
  2. Good-quality: awarded 3–4 stars in the selection domain and 1–2 stars in the comparability domain and 2 stars in the exposure domain. Fair studies: awarded 2 stars for selection and 1–2 stars for comparability and 1–2 stars for exposure. Poor-quality: awarded 0–1 stars for selection or 0 for comparability or 0 for exposure (Singh et al. 2015)